ChatGPT Uses to Support the Legal Function—Further to our recent report: “Consider GenAI Model Capabilities on Task-Specific Basis,” Debevoise’s new post summarizes tools and features available in ChatGPT Enterprise and how to use them, and provides examples of ways in which the firm uses the tools or features in its work. The examples are particularly instructive for illustrating ChatGPT’s potential to add bandwidth to historically purely manual tasks.
Board Committee Oversight of AI — “Board Governance of AI and Emerging Technologies” from Directors & Boards provides examples of areas of oversight responsibility properly allocated to board committees (audit/risk/tech; compensation and human capital; nominating & governance; and ESG), subject to the full board’s oversight responsibility. The article was authored by Samantha Kappagoda, independent director and nominating committee chair of Credit Suisse Funds, chief data scientist of Numerati Partners, visiting scholar at New York University Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, and a member of the business board of the governing council at The University of Toronto.
AI Meeting Transcription Tool Considerations — Proskauer’s "Seven Questions for Legal and Compliance Before Adopting AI Transcription Services" outlines the risks and risk mitigation tactics associated with increasingly common AI meeting transcription tools. Coverage includes mistranscription, misattribution, privilege and confidentiality waivers, discovery, reliability, and records retention.
See also "AI Notetaking in the Legal and Business Context: Does It Risk Confidentiality or Privilege?" (Bennett Jones) (Canadian leaning, but based on broadly applicable principles) and additional resources on our AI page.
This post first appeared in the weekly Society Alert!