Blogs

Institutional Investors Weigh in on Engagement & Voting

By Randi Morrison posted 3 days ago

  

Georgeson’s survey of 134 investment stewardship specialists worldwide at 54 institutional investor firms (representing $60.44 trillion in AUM) revealed these key takeaways, among others:

Engagement priorities—Board composition/succession planning topped the list of priorities for 2026, with 61% of respondents ranking these issues as their number one priority and 83% of respondents ranking these topics within the top three, as shown here:

Engagement preferences—Nearly three-quarters of respondents indicated that year-round engagement generates better results than a seasonal focus, while 63% say private dialogue results in a more effective outcome than public campaigns. 

Engagement triggers—A majority of respondents (67%) cited ownership or economic value as the number one reason for investor engagement, while 85% include it among their top three, with governance and strategic risk identified among the top three by 80%:

Activism support—A compelling business strategy is highly likely to influence investors’ decision to support an activist (cited by 87% of investors); however, other factors may also play a role, as depicted here:

Escalation—While less than half (40%) of respondents said that they are more likely to support activist shareholder proposals to achieve their desired outcome if engagement fails, an overwhelming 93% indicated they would be more inclined to vote against the board chair or individual directors, while 94% said they would be more likely to continue to engage with the company, if engagement fails.   

Access additional resources on our Institutional Investors page.

             This post first appeared in the weekly Society Alert!

0 comments
1 view

Permalink